KmikeyM covers the Econ Nobel

Rankings / Update

Pakes consolidates, and a quiet 500-lot lands on Mas-Colell

A week from the announcement, the Kalshi market concentrated on Ariel Pakes, who climbed to 32 cents on steady buying and a single 500-contract order. Robert Barro emerged as a clear third at 11. Susan Athey holds second at 15 on tiny, choppy trades. And a 500-contract print landed on Andreu Mas-Colell at 6 cents without moving the price.

A week from the announcement, the Kalshi market did what it had been hinting at for two weeks. It concentrated on one name.

Pakes. Ariel Pakes opened the week at 24 to 25 cents and climbed every day on real buying: 73 contracts at 26 on Friday, 66 at 27 on Saturday, and then, overnight into Monday, a single 500-contract buy at 28, by far the largest trade of the season. His last trade is 32. His 2,238 contracts of open interest are the most on the board, and his is the only name a buyer has pushed higher four days running. Close to a third of the market's money now sits on one economist.

Athey. Susan Athey is still second and still choppy. She was sold back to 9 on a 102-contract hit Friday, then bought up to 15 and 16 over the weekend in ones and fours. She reads 15, on a 10-bid, 16-ask book. She holds the second-largest open interest on the market, but the trades moving her are tiny, and nobody has built the kind of position Pakes now carries.

Barro climbs. Robert Barro is the week's other mover. Someone dumped 300 contracts at 7 on Thursday, the price absorbed it, and over the weekend buyers took him to 10 and then 11. He is a clear third now, though the book behind him is thin: 3 bid, 11 ask.

A 500-lot on Mas-Colell. The odd print of the weekend belongs to Andreu Mas-Colell: 500 contracts at 6 cents early Monday, almost his entire season of volume in a single trade, and the price did not move. At 6 cents it is a cheap ticket. Somebody wanted 500 of them, or wanted out of 500. Either way it is the first real size on a name that had traded in single digits all season.

The round trip closed. Richard Blundell's 168-contract buy at 14 and matching 168-contract sale at 8, which we flagged on October 1, has fully unwound. He sits at 8 on almost no open interest. One trader in and out, no change of view, as we guessed.

The rest of the board barely moved. Partha Dasgupta, Ernst Fehr and Mas-Colell sit at 6, Matthew Rabin at 5, Luigi Zingales at 2 on open interest left over from his late-September round trip.

The other markets, still quiet. Polymarket lists no economics market at all, only Peace, though economists are now publicly asking it to open one; if it does, it would instantly be the largest book on this prize. Manifold has nothing per-candidate either, only a market on whether a US citizen wins, sitting near 87 percent. HSE's prediction contest is open and closes October 12, and a second academic contest, at Tomas Bata University in Zlin, is taking public guesses through October 11. A site called Prophet Arena is overlaying AI-model forecasts on the same nine Kalshi names; an AI model from Octagon also puts Pakes first, at a much lower 7.5 percent.

What the forecasters are saying. Away from the markets, the economists who publish annual picks are converging on three themes. Scott Cunningham's October 1 list leads with skill-biased technological change (David Autor and Lawrence Katz), then machine-learning econometrics (Athey and Victor Chernozhukov), then demand estimation (Steven Berry, James Levinsohn and Pakes). Nicholas Decker and Maia Mindel both land on the same industrial-organization group built around Pakes, and Decker's headline pick is a trade prize for Sam Kortum and Marc Melitz, which can no longer include Jonathan Eaton of the Eaton-Kortum model, who died in 2024. The throughline worth marking: Pakes is the one name that shows up in both the betting and the forecasting, which is why the market can pile onto him without much argument. Last year's prize went to growth (Mokyr, Aghion, Howitt), so most lists treat growth as spent for a while.

One caution for secondhand readers. A few aggregators are circulating an "Athey 30, Pakes 25" line this week. The live Kalshi book does not support it: as of this writing Pakes is at 32 and Athey at 15. Secondhand Nobel numbers lag, and a market this small is already wrong a day later.

The prize is announced Monday, October 12, at 11:45 CEST at the earliest, the last of the 2026 announcements.

The board after this update

Contenders Strong work, right age, right timing.

#CandidateFieldSourcesScore
1 – Susan C. Athey
Stanford Graduate School of Business
Market design 2 49.3
2 – Hal R. Varian
University of California, Berkeley (emeritus); formerly Chief Economist, Google
Market design 1 42.9
2 – Sidney G. Winter
The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania (emeritus)
Innovation and firms 1 42.9
2 – Michael D. Woodford
Columbia University
Monetary 1 42.9

Darkhorses Respected, lower probability, could surprise.

#CandidateFieldSourcesScore
5 – Ariel Pakes
Harvard University
Industrial organization 2 28.0
6 ▲1 Robert J. Barro
Harvard University
Macro 2 19.0
7 ▼1 Richard Blundell
University College London / Institute for Fiscal Studies
Labor 2 17.7
8 – Partha Dasgupta
University of Cambridge
Environment 2 16.9
8 – Ernst Fehr
University of Zurich
Behavioral 2 16.9
10 – Matthew Rabin
Harvard University
Behavioral 2 16.4

The Field On our radar. The live sources are not pricing them.

#CandidateFieldSourcesScore
11 – Manuel Arellano
CEMFI, Madrid
Econometrics 1 14.3
11 – W. Brian Arthur
Santa Fe Institute
Innovation and firms 1 14.3
11 – David B. Audretsch
Indiana University
Innovation and firms 1 14.3
11 – David Autor
MIT
Labor 1 14.3
11 – Steven T. Berry
Yale University
Industrial organization 1 14.3
11 – Marianne Bertrand
University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Labor 1 14.3
11 – Jagdish Bhagwati
Columbia University
Trade 1 14.3
11 – Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute for International Economics / MIT
Macro 1 14.3
11 – Nicholas Bloom
Stanford University
Macro 1 14.3
11 – Steve Bond
University of Oxford
Econometrics 1 14.3
11 – Samuel Bowles
Santa Fe Institute
Behavioral 1 14.3
11 – Colin Camerer
California Institute of Technology
Behavioral 1 14.3
11 – Raj Chetty
Harvard University
Public economics 1 14.3
11 – Wesley M. Cohen
Duke University, Fuqua School of Business
Innovation and firms 1 14.3
11 – Janet Currie
Princeton University
Public economics 1 14.3
11 – David A. Dickey
North Carolina State University
Econometrics 1 14.3
11 – Avinash K. Dixit
Princeton University
Trade 1 14.3
11 – Kenneth R. French
Dartmouth College (Tuck School of Business)
Finance 1 14.3
11 – Wayne A. Fuller
Iowa State University
Econometrics 1 14.3
11 – Jordi Galí
CREI, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona School of Economics
Monetary 1 14.3
11 – Mark Gertler
New York University
Monetary 1 14.3
11 – Edward Glaeser
Harvard University
Growth 1 14.3
11 – Mark Granovetter
Stanford University
Theory 1 14.3
11 – Gene M. Grossman
Princeton University
Trade 1 14.3
11 – Robert E. Hall
Stanford University / Hoover Institution
Macro 1 14.3
11 – Jerry A. Hausman
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Econometrics 1 14.3
11 – Elhanan Helpman
Harvard University
Trade 1 14.3
11 – David Forbes Hendry
University of Oxford
Econometrics 1 14.3
11 – Søren Johansen
University of Copenhagen
Econometrics 1 14.3
11 – Katarina Juselius
University of Copenhagen
Econometrics 1 14.3
11 – Lawrence F. Katz
Harvard University
Labor 1 14.3
11 – Israel M. Kirzner
New York University
Theory 1 14.3
11 – Nobuhiro Kiyotaki
Princeton University
Macro 1 14.3
11 – David M. Kreps
Stanford Graduate School of Business
Theory 1 14.3
11 – Anne Osborn Krueger
Johns Hopkins University
Political economy 1 14.3
11 – Richard Layard
London School of Economics
Behavioral 1 14.3
11 – James A. Levinsohn
Yale University
Industrial organization 1 14.3
11 – Daniel A. Levinthal
University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School
Innovation and firms 1 14.3
11 – John A. List
University of Chicago
Behavioral 1 14.3
11 – George Loewenstein
Carnegie Mellon University
Behavioral 1 14.3
11 – Charles F. Manski
Northwestern University
Econometrics 1 14.3
11 – Paolo Mauro
International Finance Corporation
Political economy 1 14.3
11 – Marc Melitz
Harvard University
Trade 1 14.3
11 – John H. Moore
University of Edinburgh
Theory 1 14.3
11 – Sendhil Mullainathan
MIT
Behavioral 1 14.3
11 – Kevin M. Murphy
University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Labor 1 14.3
11 – Stewart C. Myers
MIT Sloan School of Management
Finance 1 14.3
11 – Andrew J. Oswald
University of Warwick
Behavioral 1 14.3
11 – Sam Peltzman
University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Industrial organization 1 14.3
11 – Pierre Perron
Boston University
Econometrics 1 14.3
11 – M. Hashem Pesaran
University of Southern California
Econometrics 1 14.3
11 – Peter C. B. Phillips
Yale University
Econometrics 1 14.3
11 – Thomas Piketty
Paris School of Economics
Inequality 1 14.3
11 – Richard Posner
University of Chicago Law School
Industrial organization 1 14.3
11 – Raghuram Rajan
University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Finance 1 14.3
11 – Carmen M. Reinhart
Harvard Kennedy School
Macro 1 14.3
11 – Kenneth S. Rogoff
Harvard University
Macro 1 14.3
11 – Ariel Rubinstein
Tel Aviv University / New York University
Theory 1 14.3
11 – Emmanuel Saez
UC Berkeley
Inequality 1 14.3
11 – John B. Taylor
Stanford University (Hoover Institution)
Monetary 1 14.3
11 – David J. Teece
UC Berkeley
Innovation and firms 1 14.3
11 – Gabriel Zucman
Paris School of Economics / UC Berkeley
Inequality 1 14.3
73 – Andreu Mas-Colell
Universitat Pompeu Fabra and Barcelona School of Economics (emeritus)
Theory 1 2.6
74 – Luigi Zingales
University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Finance 1 0.9