KmikeyM covers the Econ Nobel

Rankings / Update

Polymarket opens with seventeen names, and six new sources join the board

Six days out, Polymarket finally listed an economics market, with seventeen names and more money on day one than Kalshi has seen all season. Kalshi sold Ariel Pakes down from 32 to 26 and bought Susan Athey up to 20. And the board now reads six more sources, from a statistical model of the committee to ten AI models to three economists who publish their picks, every one of them to be scored against Monday's result.

Six days before the announcement, three things happened on the same day. Polymarket opened. Kalshi changed its mind about Ariel Pakes. And this desk added six sources to the board, because every one of them will be graded on Monday, and the grades are how next year's weights get set.

Polymarket opens. Polymarket listed its economics market at 09:04 UTC on Monday, October 6, with seventeen names, eight more than Kalshi has carried since July. By the end of the US day it had traded about $33,000 and was holding $43,000 of liquidity, which is more money than this prize has seen on any market this season. The top of the book agrees with Kalshi on the order and disagrees on the size: Pakes at 22, Susan Athey at 18.5, Robert Barro and Partha Dasgupta at 10. Then come the names Kalshi never listed. Victor Chernozhukov is 9.5 on eighty dollars of trade, so a wide book on a rumor. Michael Woodford is 8, Lawrence Katz is 7.5 on $2,244 of real money, Hal Varian and David Autor are 6.5, Sidney Winter is 4.5. That is the first time anyone has put a price on three of this year's four Clarivate names. And then two Argentines: Demian Reidel, the president's former chief economic adviser, at 7, and Javier Milei himself at 3, on $3,400 of volume, more than traded on Richard Blundell. A prediction market will list anyone a crowd wants to bet on. We have added both to the board, with scouting reports that say what the market line means.

Kalshi sells Pakes and buys Athey. On Kalshi, yesterday's story reversed. Pakes, who closed Sunday at 32 after a 500-contract buy, was sold hard in the US morning: 200 contracts at 35, 136 at 30, 50 at 24. Buyers came back in the afternoon and printed 35 again, and his last trade is 26 on a 17-bid, 23-ask book. Athey was the busiest name on the market, 58 trades in a day, bought from 19 up to 26 in small lots and then sold back to 20 on 150- and 80-contract hits. Her open interest, 2,725 contracts, is now the largest on the board; Pakes has slipped to second. Blundell printed 15 on 64 contracts, a thin trade on a thin book. Barro took a 200-contract buy at 12 and a 34-contract print at 18, then settled at 12. The odd position of the day belongs to Luigi Zingales: about 1,400 contracts bought at 4 and 5 cents, including two 500-lots, on the day Polymarket opened. His last trade is 3, but his open interest, 2,152, is now third on the board. Somebody wants a lot of a cheap ticket. And yesterday's 500-lot on Andreu Mas-Colell at 6 was answered today by a 200-contract sale at 1. Polymarket, for what it is worth, has him at 8.

Six new sources. The board read eight sources through Sunday; from today it reads fifteen. The new ones, with the weight we give each:

  • Richard Tol's model (weight 1.5). A statistical reconstruction of every past prize, scoring 161 living economists on citations, coauthorship with earlier laureates and the historical rotation between fields. It is the only source here that models the committee rather than the economists. It says the 2026 prize goes to information economics, game theory, development or economic history, and lists a top ten led by Sanford Grossman at 4.4 percent, Barry Eichengreen, Barro, Drew Fudenberg, Gene Grossman, Tim Besley, David Weil, Kevin Murphy, Kenneth French and Gilles Saint-Paul at 2.1 percent. Barro is the only name on that list in the top five of either market. Tol also notes that Anna Dreber fronts the committee this year, which he reads as a point for a Camerer-Loewenstein prize.
  • Prophet Arena (weight 1.5). Ten frontier language models each forecast the nine Kalshi names from one shared research briefing, and the site averages them. The consensus is Athey 37.7 percent and Pakes 20.6, the reverse of the money. The machines back Athey where the markets back Pakes, and the gap is the most interesting number on the board this week.
  • Octagon AI (weight 0.5). A single model, undisclosed method, last updated July 28, which puts Pakes first at 7.5 percent and gives four of the nine Kalshi names zero. Stale, so it carries little weight, but it is a second machine opinion and it disagrees with the first.
  • Scott Cunningham (weight 1.5). An annual ranked list, published every October since 2021, behind a paywall. His September 28 list, as Tol reported it, leads with Autor and Katz for skill-biased technological change, perhaps with Murphy, and keeps Steven Berry, James Levinsohn and Pakes as the backup. He posted an update on October 1 that we could not read; a research pass on Sunday read it as adding Athey and Chernozhukov in second place, and until we can confirm that, the board carries the September list.
  • Nicholas Decker (weight 1). One confident prediction a year, with an essay behind it. On October 4 he wrote that he was confident enough in Timothy Bresnahan, Berry and Pakes to write the article in advance. Last year he named Berry, Hausman and Pakes, then added that the committee would instead go to Aghion and Howitt, which it did.
  • Maia Mindel (weight 0.5). Berry, Bresnahan, Levinsohn and Pakes, from a thread on X that we have only secondhand, from a roundup. The weight reflects that.
  • Tomas Bata University (weight 0.5). The Zlin economics department's annual guessing game, parallel to HSE's. Entries by email through October 11; the tally comes with the prize, and the source enters the board then.

Three things we looked at and did not add. Manifold has no per-candidate market this year, only a binary on whether a US citizen wins, at 86 percent. Farhad Panahov runs an open survey that publishes no counts. And no UK bookmaker has posted an economics market, which is why the Ladbrokes line on our board is still empty.

What it does to the Power Rankings. For the first time this season, Pakes leads: 30.5 to Athey's 28.6. Eight sources now name him to her five. Berry jumps from eleventh to third on three forecasters and no market. Woodford, Varian and Winter hold fourth through sixth on Clarivate plus their new Polymarket prices. Barro is seventh, the only economist on a market, a model and a forecaster's list at once. Katz and Autor are eighth and ninth. Below the line, Bresnahan and Sanford Grossman enter at fifteenth from nowhere, Eichengreen at nineteenth, Fudenberg at twenty-first, and Blundell and Dasgupta fall to thirteenth and fourteenth as the denominator grows. Adding sources mid-season moves the board, and that is the point: the replay keeps every earlier snapshot, and on Monday every source gets a grade.

The prize is announced Monday, October 12, at 11:45 CEST at the earliest, the last of the 2026 announcements.

The board after this update

Darkhorses Respected, lower probability, could surprise.

#CandidateFieldSourcesScore
1 ▲4 Ariel Pakes
Harvard University
Industrial organization 8 30.5
2 ▼1 Susan C. Athey
Stanford Graduate School of Business
Market design 5 28.6
3 ▲8 Steven T. Berry
Yale University
Industrial organization 4 19.7
4 ▼2 Michael D. Woodford
Columbia University
Monetary 2 19.6
5 ▼3 Hal R. Varian
University of California, Berkeley (emeritus); formerly Chief Economist, Google
Market design 2 19.4
6 ▼4 Sidney G. Winter
The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania (emeritus)
Innovation and firms 2 19.0
7 ▼1 Robert J. Barro
Harvard University
Macro 6 17.9
8 ▲3 Lawrence F. Katz
Harvard University
Labor 3 16.5
9 ▲2 David Autor
MIT
Labor 3 16.3

The Field On our radar. The live sources are not pricing them.

#CandidateFieldSourcesScore
10 ▲1 James A. Levinsohn
Yale University
Industrial organization 3 13.6
11 – Kevin M. Murphy
University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Labor 3 13.3
12 ▼1 Gene M. Grossman
Princeton University
Trade 2 11.5
13 ▼6 Richard Blundell
University College London / Institute for Fiscal Studies
Labor 4 11.1
14 ▼6 Partha Dasgupta
University of Cambridge
Environment 5 9.8
15 ▲60 Timothy Bresnahan
Stanford University
Industrial organization 2 9.1
15 ▲60 Sanford Grossman
QFS Asset Management; formerly Wharton and Princeton
Finance 1 9.1
17 ▼9 Ernst Fehr
University of Zurich
Behavioral 4 8.9
18 ▼8 Matthew Rabin
Harvard University
Behavioral 4 8.7
19 ▲56 Barry Eichengreen
University of California, Berkeley
Macro 1 8.2
20 ▼9 Kenneth R. French
Dartmouth College (Tuck School of Business)
Finance 2 7.9
21 ▲54 Drew Fudenberg
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Theory 1 6.4
22 ▼11 Manuel Arellano
CEMFI, Madrid
Econometrics 1 6.1
22 ▼11 W. Brian Arthur
Santa Fe Institute
Innovation and firms 1 6.1
22 ▼11 David B. Audretsch
Indiana University
Innovation and firms 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Marianne Bertrand
University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Labor 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Jagdish Bhagwati
Columbia University
Trade 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute for International Economics / MIT
Macro 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Nicholas Bloom
Stanford University
Macro 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Steve Bond
University of Oxford
Econometrics 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Samuel Bowles
Santa Fe Institute
Behavioral 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Colin Camerer
California Institute of Technology
Behavioral 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Raj Chetty
Harvard University
Public economics 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Wesley M. Cohen
Duke University, Fuqua School of Business
Innovation and firms 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Janet Currie
Princeton University
Public economics 1 6.1
22 ▼11 David A. Dickey
North Carolina State University
Econometrics 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Avinash K. Dixit
Princeton University
Trade 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Wayne A. Fuller
Iowa State University
Econometrics 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Jordi Galí
CREI, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona School of Economics
Monetary 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Mark Gertler
New York University
Monetary 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Edward Glaeser
Harvard University
Growth 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Mark Granovetter
Stanford University
Theory 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Robert E. Hall
Stanford University / Hoover Institution
Macro 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Jerry A. Hausman
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Econometrics 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Elhanan Helpman
Harvard University
Trade 1 6.1
22 ▼11 David Forbes Hendry
University of Oxford
Econometrics 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Søren Johansen
University of Copenhagen
Econometrics 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Katarina Juselius
University of Copenhagen
Econometrics 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Israel M. Kirzner
New York University
Theory 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Nobuhiro Kiyotaki
Princeton University
Macro 1 6.1
22 ▼11 David M. Kreps
Stanford Graduate School of Business
Theory 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Anne Osborn Krueger
Johns Hopkins University
Political economy 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Richard Layard
London School of Economics
Behavioral 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Daniel A. Levinthal
University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School
Innovation and firms 1 6.1
22 ▼11 John A. List
University of Chicago
Behavioral 1 6.1
22 ▼11 George Loewenstein
Carnegie Mellon University
Behavioral 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Charles F. Manski
Northwestern University
Econometrics 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Paolo Mauro
International Finance Corporation
Political economy 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Marc Melitz
Harvard University
Trade 1 6.1
22 ▼11 John H. Moore
University of Edinburgh
Theory 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Sendhil Mullainathan
MIT
Behavioral 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Stewart C. Myers
MIT Sloan School of Management
Finance 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Andrew J. Oswald
University of Warwick
Behavioral 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Sam Peltzman
University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Industrial organization 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Pierre Perron
Boston University
Econometrics 1 6.1
22 ▼11 M. Hashem Pesaran
University of Southern California
Econometrics 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Peter C. B. Phillips
Yale University
Econometrics 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Thomas Piketty
Paris School of Economics
Inequality 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Richard Posner
University of Chicago Law School
Industrial organization 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Raghuram Rajan
University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Finance 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Carmen M. Reinhart
Harvard Kennedy School
Macro 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Kenneth S. Rogoff
Harvard University
Macro 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Ariel Rubinstein
Tel Aviv University / New York University
Theory 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Emmanuel Saez
UC Berkeley
Inequality 1 6.1
22 ▼11 John B. Taylor
Stanford University (Hoover Institution)
Monetary 1 6.1
22 ▼11 David J. Teece
UC Berkeley
Innovation and firms 1 6.1
22 ▼11 Gabriel Zucman
Paris School of Economics / UC Berkeley
Inequality 1 6.1
77 ▼2 Tim Besley
London School of Economics
Development 1 4.5
78 ▼3 David Weil
Brown University
Growth 1 3.6
79 ▼6 Andreu Mas-Colell
Universitat Pompeu Fabra and Barcelona School of Economics (emeritus)
Theory 3 2.0
80 ▼6 Luigi Zingales
University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Finance 4 1.8
81 ▼6 Victor Chernozhukov
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Econometrics 1 1.7
82 ▼7 Demian Reidel
Nucleoeléctrica Argentina; former chief economic adviser to President Milei
Macro 1 1.3
83 ▼8 Gilles Saint-Paul
Paris School of Economics and École normale supérieure
Growth 1 0.9
84 ▼9 Javier Milei
President of Argentina
Political economy 1 0.5
85 ▼10 Francine Blau
Cornell University
Labor 0 0.0
85 ▼10 Matthew Jackson
Stanford University
Theory 0 0.0