KmikeyM covers the Econ Nobel

KmikeyM Power Rankings

Who wins the 2026 Economics Nobel. One composite score over every prediction source we track, re-ranked with each update. How the score works.

As of Sep 25, 2026 · Leader: Susan C. Athey at 68.6

Contenders Strong work, right age, right timing.

#CandidateFieldSourcesScore
1 – Susan C. Athey
Stanford Graduate School of Business
Market design 2 68.6
2 – Hal R. Varian
University of California, Berkeley (emeritus); formerly Chief Economist, Google
Market design 1 42.9
2 – Sidney G. Winter
The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania (emeritus)
Innovation and firms 1 42.9
2 – Michael D. Woodford
Columbia University
Monetary 1 42.9

Darkhorses Respected, lower probability, could surprise.

#CandidateFieldSourcesScore
5 – Ariel Pakes
Harvard University
Industrial organization 2 22.0
6 – Robert J. Barro
Harvard University
Macro 2 19.0
7 ▲1 Ernst Fehr
University of Zurich
Behavioral 2 18.6
8 ▲1 Matthew Rabin
Harvard University
Behavioral 2 18.1
9 ▼3 Richard Blundell
University College London / Institute for Fiscal Studies
Labor 2 17.3
10 – Partha Dasgupta
University of Cambridge
Environment 2 16.9

The Field On our radar. The live sources are not pricing them.

#CandidateFieldSourcesScore
11 – Manuel Arellano
CEMFI, Madrid
Econometrics 1 14.3
11 – W. Brian Arthur
Santa Fe Institute
Innovation and firms 1 14.3
11 – David B. Audretsch
Indiana University
Innovation and firms 1 14.3
11 – David Autor
MIT
Labor 1 14.3
11 – Steven T. Berry
Yale University
Industrial organization 1 14.3
11 – Marianne Bertrand
University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Labor 1 14.3
11 – Jagdish Bhagwati
Columbia University
Trade 1 14.3
11 – Olivier Blanchard
Peterson Institute for International Economics / MIT
Macro 1 14.3
11 – Nicholas Bloom
Stanford University
Macro 1 14.3
11 – Steve Bond
University of Oxford
Econometrics 1 14.3
11 – Samuel Bowles
Santa Fe Institute
Behavioral 1 14.3
11 – Colin Camerer
California Institute of Technology
Behavioral 1 14.3
11 – Raj Chetty
Harvard University
Public economics 1 14.3
11 – Wesley M. Cohen
Duke University, Fuqua School of Business
Innovation and firms 1 14.3
11 – Janet Currie
Princeton University
Public economics 1 14.3
11 – David A. Dickey
North Carolina State University
Econometrics 1 14.3
11 – Avinash K. Dixit
Princeton University
Trade 1 14.3
11 – Kenneth R. French
Dartmouth College (Tuck School of Business)
Finance 1 14.3
11 – Wayne A. Fuller
Iowa State University
Econometrics 1 14.3
11 – Jordi Galí
CREI, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona School of Economics
Monetary 1 14.3
11 – Mark Gertler
New York University
Monetary 1 14.3
11 – Edward Glaeser
Harvard University
Growth 1 14.3
11 – Mark Granovetter
Stanford University
Theory 1 14.3
11 – Gene M. Grossman
Princeton University
Trade 1 14.3
11 – Robert E. Hall
Stanford University / Hoover Institution
Macro 1 14.3
11 – Jerry A. Hausman
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Econometrics 1 14.3
11 – Elhanan Helpman
Harvard University
Trade 1 14.3
11 – David Forbes Hendry
University of Oxford
Econometrics 1 14.3
11 – Søren Johansen
University of Copenhagen
Econometrics 1 14.3
11 – Katarina Juselius
University of Copenhagen
Econometrics 1 14.3
11 – Lawrence F. Katz
Harvard University
Labor 1 14.3
11 – Israel M. Kirzner
New York University
Theory 1 14.3
11 – Nobuhiro Kiyotaki
Princeton University
Macro 1 14.3
11 – David M. Kreps
Stanford Graduate School of Business
Theory 1 14.3
11 – Anne Osborn Krueger
Johns Hopkins University
Political economy 1 14.3
11 – Richard Layard
London School of Economics
Behavioral 1 14.3
11 – James A. Levinsohn
Yale University
Industrial organization 1 14.3
11 – Daniel A. Levinthal
University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School
Innovation and firms 1 14.3
11 – John A. List
University of Chicago
Behavioral 1 14.3
11 – George Loewenstein
Carnegie Mellon University
Behavioral 1 14.3
11 – Charles F. Manski
Northwestern University
Econometrics 1 14.3
11 – Paolo Mauro
International Finance Corporation
Political economy 1 14.3
11 – Marc Melitz
Harvard University
Trade 1 14.3
11 – John H. Moore
University of Edinburgh
Theory 1 14.3
11 – Sendhil Mullainathan
MIT
Behavioral 1 14.3
11 – Kevin M. Murphy
University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Labor 1 14.3
11 – Stewart C. Myers
MIT Sloan School of Management
Finance 1 14.3
11 – Andrew J. Oswald
University of Warwick
Behavioral 1 14.3
11 – Sam Peltzman
University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Industrial organization 1 14.3
11 – Pierre Perron
Boston University
Econometrics 1 14.3
11 – M. Hashem Pesaran
University of Southern California
Econometrics 1 14.3
11 – Peter C. B. Phillips
Yale University
Econometrics 1 14.3
11 – Thomas Piketty
Paris School of Economics
Inequality 1 14.3
11 – Richard Posner
University of Chicago Law School
Industrial organization 1 14.3
11 – Raghuram Rajan
University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Finance 1 14.3
11 – Carmen M. Reinhart
Harvard Kennedy School
Macro 1 14.3
11 – Kenneth S. Rogoff
Harvard University
Macro 1 14.3
11 – Ariel Rubinstein
Tel Aviv University / New York University
Theory 1 14.3
11 – Emmanuel Saez
UC Berkeley
Inequality 1 14.3
11 – John B. Taylor
Stanford University (Hoover Institution)
Monetary 1 14.3
11 – David J. Teece
UC Berkeley
Innovation and firms 1 14.3
11 – Gabriel Zucman
Paris School of Economics / UC Berkeley
Inequality 1 14.3
73 – Andreu Mas-Colell
Universitat Pompeu Fabra and Barcelona School of Economics (emeritus)
Theory 1 4.3
74 – Luigi Zingales
University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Finance 1 0.9

Latest updates

From the desk: the early coverage, and a source we are retiring

Two and a half weeks out, a model built from past winners forecasts information economics or game theory and puts Sanford Grossman first, at 4.4 percent. The IO case for Berry, Hausman and Pakes keeps getting made. Everything else is either last year's coverage or a list that includes past winners.

Read more

All 5 updates